This Is Auburn

Show simple item record

Bigger is not better: Larger bees face greater risks from climate change


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPenick, Clint
dc.contributor.authorWolff, Theresa
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-04T19:27:53Z
dc.date.available2025-08-04T19:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/9937
dc.description.abstractBody size plays a fundamental role in how animals respond to their environment. Smaller animals are more vulnerable to heat loss and desiccation due to their high surface-area-to-volume ratio. I investigated the relationship between bee body size and climate response by measuring physiological tolerance in the lab and physiological resistance in the field. I found that small bees are cooler while foraging than larger bees, but body size does not significantly affect thermal tolerance. I found that smaller bees are drier but have a greater desiccation tolerance, which evolved due to regular exposure to high desiccation risk. For all results except for desiccation tolerance, relationships are independent of phylogenetic relatedness. Finally, larger bees are closer to their absolute physiological limits and therefore may be at increased risk to the effects of climate change. If we see declines in large bees, we may see changes in pollination services and plant communities.en_US
dc.subjectEntomology and Plant Pathologyen_US
dc.titleBigger is not better: Larger bees face greater risks from climate changeen_US
dc.typeMaster's Thesisen_US
dc.embargo.statusNOT_EMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2025-08-04en_US
dc.contributor.committeeAbbate, Anthony
dc.contributor.committeeJacobson, Alana

Files in this item

Show simple item record